A one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
..
 
 
one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
Menu
Web-Site Launch Photographs
RTI Act, 2005
Hindi
English
Other language
Rules
Central rules
State rules
Guide book
DOPT circulars
Important judgments
Supreme court
High court
Tracking the appeal at CIC
Link to Information Commission
Link to other Organisations
For an Applicant
FAQ
For a PIO
FAQ
Feedback
Books on RTI
Join us


Marks scored by the appellant in exam for Sub-inspector in Delhi Police, CAPFs & Assistant Sub-inspector in CISF - Respondent: Result of candidate was withheld - CIC: No exemption clause invoked; SCN issued to PIO for arbitrary denial; Provide information     Right to Information Act 2005    Copy of the 10 finger and thumb impressions taken on biometric were denied by UIDAI claiming that sharing of "core biometric information" is prohibited u/s 2(i) of Aadhaar Act - CIC: PIO’s response is legally appropriate; No further intervention necessary     Right to Information Act 2005    CIC: 20 Second Appeal cases of the Appellant against the same Public Authorities had already been disposed of by CIC while 9 are listed; Appellant has grossly misconceived the idea of exercising his Right to Information as being absolute and unconditional     Right to Information Act 2005    CIC: FAA’s order set aside holding that the directions for disclosure of information were passed without application of mind; Personal details including educational qualification of other candidates is held by UPSC in as fiduciary, exempt u/s 8(1)(j)     Right to Information Act 2005    Respondent: From where 'Ajit Newspaper' got the said documentary evidence is not on record; While the PIO was providing the information, RTI applicant repeated communications - CIC: It casts immense pressure on CPIOs to provide the correct deduction     Right to Information Act 2005    Enquiry findings in relation to the complaints were denied u/s 8(1)(j) and 8(1)(g) - CIC: PIO should have redacted the personal information of other third-party officers by invoking Section 10; Provide broad updated outcome of Appellant’s complaint     Right to Information Act 2005    Vijai Sharma and K V Chowdary appointed as CIC and CVC respectively     Right to Information Act 2005    Is the Mysore Police Commissioner’s office coming up without plan approval?     Right to Information Act 2005    No action taken against the illegal massage parlours or spas in Goa     Right to Information Act 2005    Are there norms about the fee a school should charge and the facilities it offers?     Right to Information Act 2005    There is only 1 primary health centre per 28 villages of UP     Right to Information Act 2005    Services of all OSDs / Consultants terminated by Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai     Right to Information Act 2005    Degree of an individual is personal and does not warrant disclosure under the RTI Act     Right to Information Act 2005    Inordinate delay in the hearing and disposal of second appeals     Right to Information Act 2005    Information Commissioner abdicated the statutory responsibility and acted as an agent of the government     Right to Information Act 2005   
2nd edition of "PIOs Guide on RTI" published - Based on study of over one lakh orders of CIC and judgments of Courts - Book carries subject wise case laws, latest legal updates, Practical tips for PIOs and FAAs - Needs of all stakeholders covered
Payment of Fee

2.b Fee for the State Government Authorities?

The quantum of fee fixed by the different State Governments which should accompany the RTI application is shown below:

 

State Application fee
Arunachal Pradesh (a) Rs. 500 for tender document/ bids/ quotation/ business contracts
(b) Rs 50/- for other than (a)
Andhra Pradesh (a) In respect of public authorities at the Village Level-no fee;
(b) In respect of public authorities at Mandal Level-Rs.5/- per application
c) In respect of public authorities other than those covered above-Rs.10/- per application;
Assam, Delhi, Goa, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Orissa, Pondicherry, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamilnadu, Tripura, Uttatanchal, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal Rs. 10/-
Daman & Diu Rs. 25/-
Gujarat Rs. 20/-
Haryana Rs. 50/-
Sikkim Rs. 100/-

The cost of providing information (further fee) fixed by the various State Governments is as under:

State Documents
A 4/ A3 Large size CD/ Floppy Sample or model
Andhra Pradesh Rs. 2/- Actual Charges Rs. 100 for CD
Rs 200 for DVD		 Actual Cost
Arunachal Pradesh Rs 5/-      
Assam, Bihar, Delhi, Goa, Gujarat, Rs 2/- Actual charges Rs 50/- for each for CD Actual charges
Chandigarh 10/- Do Rs 100/- for Floppy
Rs 200/- for CD or DVD		 Do
Daman & Diu, Rs 2/- Do Rs 100/- for Floppy
Rs 200/- for CD		 Do
Haryana Rs 10/- Do Do Do
Himachal Pradesh Rs 10/- do Do Do
Jharkhand Rs 2/- Actual Charges Rs 50/- for floppy;
Rs 100/- for CD;
Rs 200/- for DVD		 Do
Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Meghalalya, Maharashtra, Nagaland, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamilnadu, Tripura, Uttaranchal, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal Rs 2/- Actual charges Rs 50/- Actual charges
Kerala Rs 2/- Do Rs 50/- for each floppy; Rs 100 for each CD Do
Mizoram Rs 2/- (Rs.5/- for computer print out) Do Rs 50 per CD/floppy Do
Pondicherry  Rs 2/- Do - Do
Sikkim Rs 10/- Do Actual cost Charges as fixed

How to file a RTI application

Step-2