A one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
..
 
 
A one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
Menu
Web-Site Launch Photographs
RTI Act, 2005
Hindi
English
Other language
Rules
Central rules
State rules
Guide book
DOPT circulars
Important judgments
Supreme court
High court
Tracking the appeal at CIC
Link to Information Commission
Link to other Organisations
For an Applicant
FAQ
For a PIO
FAQ
Feedback
Books on RTI
Join us


39 appeals of the appellant were heard together - In view of the position of the appellant withdrawing her appeals & also the university had taken proactive steps to provide her the information sought, the CIC sees no reason to intervene in the matter     Right to Information Act 2005    CIC: It is abundantly clear that such matters are being ignored & set aside without application of mind - CIC: The PIO & FAA to showcause why action should not be taken for misconduct & negligence; Conduct periodic RTI training & seminar     Right to Information Act 2005    Respondent: It was a joint enquiry report & the facts of all charged officers were closely inter-mingled making it virtually impossible to sift out the portion of the enquiry report pertaining to the appellant - CIC agreed to the respondent’s submissions     Right to Information Act 2005    CIC: It was seen that reply provided by respondent was just and proper but late; Warning issued to the PIO - CIC: Since the appellant did not receive the same, the respondent PIO is directed to resend the reply to the appellant     Right to Information Act 2005    Disclosure of information was denied u/s 8 (1) (h) claiming that a quasi-judicial proceeding was under process - CIC: The Appellant was not present to contest the submissions of the respondent or to establish the larger public interest in disclosure     Right to Information Act 2005    Respondent: Documents pertaining to the court order in CWP No. 274/94 have been damaged by termites; hence, action taken by the NFSC in the light of the said order could not be provided - CIC: Provide information to the appellant within four weeks     Right to Information Act 2005    Vijai Sharma and K V Chowdary appointed as CIC and CVC respectively     Right to Information Act 2005    Is the Mysore Police Commissioner’s office coming up without plan approval?     Right to Information Act 2005    No action taken against the illegal massage parlours or spas in Goa     Right to Information Act 2005    Are there norms about the fee a school should charge and the facilities it offers?     Right to Information Act 2005    There is only 1 primary health centre per 28 villages of UP     Right to Information Act 2005    Services of all OSDs / Consultants terminated by Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai     Right to Information Act 2005    Official data regarding the complaints of human rights violations between 2012-2016     Right to Information Act 2005    What are "human rights violations" under the RTI Act, 2005?     Right to Information Act 2005    Has the Indian judiciary been lax in its implementation of the RTI Act, 2005?     Right to Information Act 2005   

Case Laws

July 22, 2017
39 appeals of the appellant were heard together - In view of the position of the appellant withdrawing her appeals & also the university had taken proactive steps to provide her the information sought, the CIC sees no reason to intervene in the matter...more>> 		July 20, 2017
CIC: It is abundantly clear that such matters are being ignored & set aside without application of mind - CIC: The PIO & FAA to showcause why action should not be taken for misconduct & negligence; Conduct periodic RTI training & seminar...more>>
July 18, 2017
Respondent: It was a joint enquiry report & the facts of all charged officers were closely inter-mingled making it virtually impossible to sift out the portion of the enquiry report pertaining to the appellant - CIC agreed to the respondent’s submissions...more>> 		July 16, 2017
CIC: It was seen that reply provided by respondent was just and proper but late; Warning issued to the PIO - CIC: Since the appellant did not receive the same, the respondent PIO is directed to resend the reply to the appellant...more>>
July 14, 2017
Disclosure of information was denied u/s 8 (1) (h) claiming that a quasi-judicial proceeding was under process - CIC: The Appellant was not present to contest the submissions of the respondent or to establish the larger public interest in disclosure...more>> 		July 12, 2017
Respondent: Documents pertaining to the court order in CWP No. 274/94 have been damaged by termites; hence, action taken by the NFSC in the light of the said order could not be provided - CIC: Provide information to the appellant within four weeks...more>>

Articles

Official data regarding the complaints of human rights violations between 2012-2016
July 15, 2017 RTI can be a tool for greater transparency and accountability   more>>
What are "human rights violations" under the RTI Act, 2005?
June 22, 2017 The attack on CRPF raises multiple questions and hopefully the Delhi High Court would address them all   more>>
Has the Indian judiciary been lax in its implementation of the RTI Act, 2005?
June 1, 2017 A Project report analyses the RTI compliance across High Courts of India   more>>

Comments

Some students appearing in Class 10 board don't even know addition and subtraction
July 17, 2017 Can any action can be taken against the schools?   more>>
The Information Commission is purely service oriented
July 15, 2017 Speedy disposal is important for solving the grievances of the public   more>>
Most of the citizens still don’t know what kind of Information can be availed through RTI
July 12, 2017 RTI is a very powerful law available to every citizen of India to get the information   more>>