A one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
..
HOME
INTRODUCTION
ABOUT US
CONTACT US
SEARCH
HOW TO FILE RTI APPLICATION
one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
Menu
Home
Introduction
About- Us
Contact Us
DOPT circulars
Link to other Organisations
FAQ - For an Applicant
FAQ - For a PIO
Join us
Web-Site Launch Photographs
Web-Site Launch Photographs
RTI Act, 2005
Hindi
English
Other language
Rules
Central rules
State rules
Guide book
DOPT circulars
Important judgments
Supreme court
High court
Tracking the appeal at CIC
Link to Information Commission
Link to other Organisations
For an Applicant
FAQ
For a PIO
FAQ
Feedback
Books on RTI
Join us
CIC: Provide the minutes of the review DPC making sure that information which is related to the Appellant should be furnished; Any other information which is exempted from disclosure must be redacted u/s 10 of RTI Act and not be disclosed to the Appellant
Appellant: I have submitted my personal application to PMO and without hearing of witness or awaiting outcome representation, I was fired from Air Force - CIC: PIO has provided the information which is available on record; No further intervention needed
Personnel allegedly gave wrong information to FM in the reply to parliamentary question - Respondent: A speculative request - CIC: Desist from filing repetitive RTI Applications as Appeal(s) emanating from the same are liable to be summarily dismissed
Central Empowered Committee: Documents pertaining to particular application filed by Sheth Anandji Kalyanji Trust and sought by the Applicant are not available in records - CIC: Appropriate response has been provided; Explain the absence during hearing
Refusal by Financial Services Institutions Bureau (FSIB) to provide information related to the appointment of Mr. Pankaj Dwivedi, accused of heinous crimes against women, as Executive Director in Public Sector Banks - CIC: Denail u/s 8(1)(j) is justified
What does the term “Relevant Trades” in eligibility criteria mean? - CIC: Requisite information should have been disclosed upfront or through FAQs; Advisory issued u/s 25(5) to disclose the meaning of “Relevant Trade” & to create a FAQ section on website
Vijai Sharma and K V Chowdary appointed as CIC and CVC respectively
Is the Mysore Police Commissioner’s office coming up without plan approval?
No action taken against the illegal massage parlours or spas in Goa
Are there norms about the fee a school should charge and the facilities it offers?
There is only 1 primary health centre per 28 villages of UP
Services of all OSDs / Consultants terminated by Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
RTI portal – Supreme Court issues contempt notice to the States and UTs
Reasons for seeking certified copies is not inconsistent with the provisions of RTI Act
Regulation 21 of Consumer Protection Regulation does not prohibit grant of records to RTI Applicants
2nd edition of "PIOs Guide on RTI" published - Based on study of over one lakh orders of CIC and judgments of Courts - Book carries subject wise case laws, latest legal updates, Practical tips for PIOs and FAAs - Needs of all stakeholders covered
Share on facebook
Tweet
Email
Gmail
Google
Rediff
Delhi HC seeks copies of audited accounts of Rajiv Gandhi Foundation
6 Jul, 2012
Justice Rajiv Shakdher of the Delhi High Court has directed the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation (RGF) to place on record its annual audited accounts right from its inception till 2010-2011 to decide whether the organization should be included within the ambit of the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The next date of hearing the matter has been fixed for November 21. The HC directed "File the annual audited accounts right from its inception till the year 2010-2011 along with a tabular statement indicating year-wise overall income of the Foundation and the component thereof received from the central as well as state governments or the instrumentalities thereof,",
The Delhi High Court was hearing the plea of a Delhi-based lawyer, Mr. Shanmuga Patro, who challenged the order of the Central Information Commission (CIC) dismissing his appeal while holding that the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation is not a public authority. Earlier Mr. Patro had filed an application under the RTI Act seeking a copy of the constitution of the RGF, a copy of the updated bye-laws and rules and regulation of the Foundation and a copy of the documents showing its organizational structure. He claimed that the RGF was in receipt of funds from the government, and it is engaged in large-scale public activities and by virtue of such activities it assumes the character of a public authority. The RGF had denied the information on the ground that it was not a public authority and had received only 4% funding from the government, which is not substantial. Therefore, it is not a public authority and does not fall under the purview of Section
2(h)
“public authority” means any authority or body or institution of self-government established or constituted (a) by or under the Constitution; (b) by any other law made by Parliament; (c) by any other law made by State Legislature; (d) by notification issued or order made by the appropriate Government, and includes any- (i) body owned, controlled or substantially financed; (ii) non-Government organization substantially financed, directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate Government;
of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.