A one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
..
HOME
INTRODUCTION
ABOUT US
CONTACT US
SEARCH
HOW TO FILE RTI APPLICATION
one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
Menu
Home
Introduction
About- Us
Contact Us
DOPT circulars
Link to other Organisations
FAQ - For an Applicant
FAQ - For a PIO
Join us
Web-Site Launch Photographs
Web-Site Launch Photographs
RTI Act, 2005
Hindi
English
Other language
Rules
Central rules
State rules
Guide book
DOPT circulars
Important judgments
Supreme court
High court
Tracking the appeal at CIC
Link to Information Commission
Link to other Organisations
For an Applicant
FAQ
For a PIO
FAQ
Feedback
Books on RTI
Join us
Information about pay scale PGT teachers working with Universal Public School - Appellant: Documents provided to him are not attested or certified by the PIO - CIC: Respondent to provide certified copies of relevant information free of charge to Appellant
Documents about recruitment of Data Entry Operators was denied u/s 8(1)(j) - CIC: In the absence of the appellant to plead his case or contest the CPIO’s submissions and in the absence of the larger public interest, no scope of intervention in the matter
Certified copy of the applications for membership/recognition by Indian Golf Union for clubs in Maharashtra - CIC: Information has not been provided; Respondent is directed to revisit the RTI application and provide the revised information
CIC: Furnish a revised reply regarding original note of sanctioning of education loan after redacting third party information - CIC took a serious note of the PIO’s absence during the hearing and sought reasons for remaining absent
Certified Copies of Accounts, Agreement File and Measurement Book of Work Orders - CIC: PIO has provided a misleading reply even after the FAA directions; PIO admonished, warned and directed to send a revised reply furnishing the relevant information
Certified copy of Hindi language version of the affidavit of assets - PIO: Official language of Supreme Court of India is English, proceedings are in English, language for administrative purpose is also English - CIC: Follow the Supreme Court Rules 2013
Vijai Sharma and K V Chowdary appointed as CIC and CVC respectively
Is the Mysore Police Commissioner’s office coming up without plan approval?
No action taken against the illegal massage parlours or spas in Goa
Are there norms about the fee a school should charge and the facilities it offers?
There is only 1 primary health centre per 28 villages of UP
Services of all OSDs / Consultants terminated by Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Degree of an individual is personal and does not warrant disclosure under the RTI Act
Inordinate delay in the hearing and disposal of second appeals
Information Commissioner abdicated the statutory responsibility and acted as an agent of the government
2nd edition of "PIOs Guide on RTI" published - Based on study of over one lakh orders of CIC and judgments of Courts - Book carries subject wise case laws, latest legal updates, Practical tips for PIOs and FAAs - Needs of all stakeholders covered
Share on facebook
Tweet
Email
Gmail
Google
Rediff
Delhi HC seeks copies of audited accounts of Rajiv Gandhi Foundation
6 Jul, 2012
Justice Rajiv Shakdher of the Delhi High Court has directed the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation (RGF) to place on record its annual audited accounts right from its inception till 2010-2011 to decide whether the organization should be included within the ambit of the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The next date of hearing the matter has been fixed for November 21. The HC directed "File the annual audited accounts right from its inception till the year 2010-2011 along with a tabular statement indicating year-wise overall income of the Foundation and the component thereof received from the central as well as state governments or the instrumentalities thereof,",
The Delhi High Court was hearing the plea of a Delhi-based lawyer, Mr. Shanmuga Patro, who challenged the order of the Central Information Commission (CIC) dismissing his appeal while holding that the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation is not a public authority. Earlier Mr. Patro had filed an application under the RTI Act seeking a copy of the constitution of the RGF, a copy of the updated bye-laws and rules and regulation of the Foundation and a copy of the documents showing its organizational structure. He claimed that the RGF was in receipt of funds from the government, and it is engaged in large-scale public activities and by virtue of such activities it assumes the character of a public authority. The RGF had denied the information on the ground that it was not a public authority and had received only 4% funding from the government, which is not substantial. Therefore, it is not a public authority and does not fall under the purview of Section
2(h)
“public authority” means any authority or body or institution of self-government established or constituted (a) by or under the Constitution; (b) by any other law made by Parliament; (c) by any other law made by State Legislature; (d) by notification issued or order made by the appropriate Government, and includes any- (i) body owned, controlled or substantially financed; (ii) non-Government organization substantially financed, directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate Government;
of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.