A one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
..
HOME
INTRODUCTION
ABOUT US
CONTACT US
SEARCH
HOW TO FILE RTI APPLICATION
one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
Menu
Home
Introduction
About- Us
Contact Us
DOPT circulars
Link to other Organisations
FAQ - For an Applicant
FAQ - For a PIO
Join us
Web-Site Launch Photographs
Web-Site Launch Photographs
RTI Act, 2005
Hindi
English
Other language
Rules
Central rules
State rules
Guide book
DOPT circulars
Important judgments
Supreme court
High court
Tracking the appeal at CIC
Link to Information Commission
Link to other Organisations
For an Applicant
FAQ
For a PIO
FAQ
Feedback
Books on RTI
Join us
Copy of two member Committee report of 123 Waqf Properties was denied claiming that it is under examination and is subjudice - Respondent: This Appeal was already adjudicated by the Bench in a similar matter of another applicant - CIC: No power to review
Action taken by the Hon’ble President of India regarding certain letters, copy of notesheet, movement register etc. was sought - CIC: Reply bears no relevance to the information sought for by the Appellant, rather the reply appears to be mechanical
CIC: No record was shown to exist with the Respondent regarding the complaint; complaint was not even addressed to the Respondent Authority instead it was sent to a different department; response by the PIO and FAA found to be as per the RTI Act
Water connection application and related information was sought - PIO: Documents submitted by third party for water connection, disclosure of which had no relationship to any public activity or interest, hence, exempt u/s 8(1)(j) - CIC: Denial upheld
Pension and basic pay details of her late father was considered as personal information as after death of the appellant’s father, information now pertains to her mother; Disclosure has no relationship to any public activity or interest; Exempt u/s 8(1)(j)
Husband was asked to provide proof such as marriage certificate or authorization letter from the Appellant for inspection of records of sexual harassment complaint - CIC: Information containing 332 pages would attract Sec 7(9) of RTI Act being voluminous
Vijai Sharma and K V Chowdary appointed as CIC and CVC respectively
Is the Mysore Police Commissioner’s office coming up without plan approval?
No action taken against the illegal massage parlours or spas in Goa
Are there norms about the fee a school should charge and the facilities it offers?
There is only 1 primary health centre per 28 villages of UP
Services of all OSDs / Consultants terminated by Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Information Commissioner abdicated the statutory responsibility and acted as an agent of the government
Does non-maintenance of records defeat the rights accrued in favour of the RTI appellant?
Draft Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 release by MeitY for public consultation
2nd edition of "PIOs Guide on RTI" published - Based on study of over one lakh orders of CIC and judgments of Courts - Book carries subject wise case laws, latest legal updates, Practical tips for PIOs and FAAs - Needs of all stakeholders covered
Share on facebook
Tweet
Email
Gmail
Google
Rediff
56% of complaints sent back to department for action by ACB
2 May, 2013
Reply to an application filed under the Right to Information (RTI) Act has revealed that the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) of Maharashtra recorded 3,522 complaints of corruption last year. Out of these, the ACB forwarded 1,973 (56%) to the concerned departments for inquiry. The ACB did not conduct any investigation of its own because of manpower shortage and because many complaints were vague or not credible. It is yet to receive a response from a department on any of these complaints.
In 1972, the state government had issued a circular which restrained the ACB from probing government employees without first referring the complaint for a departmental inquiry to the head of the concerned department. The circular was in existence till the early part of this century when the Bombay high court quashed it. However, the practise continues as exemplified from the figures for Mumbai, where the ACB redirected nearly 77% of the 1,618 complaints received by it. The practice of the Anti-Corruption Bureau's (ACB) to refer the cases to the very departments against whose officials the complaints were made has been criticised by many social activists. The ability of the department to conduct an enquiry is limited as they neither have powers to conduct raids or searches nor can question a private individual.
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.