A one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
..
HOME
INTRODUCTION
ABOUT US
CONTACT US
SEARCH
HOW TO FILE RTI APPLICATION
one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
Menu
Home
Introduction
About- Us
Contact Us
DOPT circulars
Link to other Organisations
FAQ - For an Applicant
FAQ - For a PIO
Join us
Web-Site Launch Photographs
Web-Site Launch Photographs
RTI Act, 2005
Hindi
English
Other language
Rules
Central rules
State rules
Guide book
DOPT circulars
Important judgments
Supreme court
High court
Tracking the appeal at CIC
Link to Information Commission
Link to other Organisations
For an Applicant
FAQ
For a PIO
FAQ
Feedback
Books on RTI
Join us
Information about PMO such as Anti-corruption unit in the PMΟ, generic mail ID, complaints of corruption against Public Servants, SOP followed for PMs photographs, speeches, interviews and bio-data etc. - CIC: Appropriate information has been provided
Information about pay scale PGT teachers working with Universal Public School - Appellant: Documents provided to him are not attested or certified by the PIO - CIC: Respondent to provide certified copies of relevant information free of charge to Appellant
Documents about recruitment of Data Entry Operators was denied u/s 8(1)(j) - CIC: In the absence of the appellant to plead his case or contest the CPIO’s submissions and in the absence of the larger public interest, no scope of intervention in the matter
Certified copy of the applications for membership/recognition by Indian Golf Union for clubs in Maharashtra - CIC: Information has not been provided; Respondent is directed to revisit the RTI application and provide the revised information
CIC: Furnish a revised reply regarding original note of sanctioning of education loan after redacting third party information - CIC took a serious note of the PIO’s absence during the hearing and sought reasons for remaining absent
Certified Copies of Accounts, Agreement File and Measurement Book of Work Orders - CIC: PIO has provided a misleading reply even after the FAA directions; PIO admonished, warned and directed to send a revised reply furnishing the relevant information
Vijai Sharma and K V Chowdary appointed as CIC and CVC respectively
Is the Mysore Police Commissioner’s office coming up without plan approval?
No action taken against the illegal massage parlours or spas in Goa
Are there norms about the fee a school should charge and the facilities it offers?
There is only 1 primary health centre per 28 villages of UP
Services of all OSDs / Consultants terminated by Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Degree of an individual is personal and does not warrant disclosure under the RTI Act
Inordinate delay in the hearing and disposal of second appeals
Information Commissioner abdicated the statutory responsibility and acted as an agent of the government
2nd edition of "PIOs Guide on RTI" published - Based on study of over one lakh orders of CIC and judgments of Courts - Book carries subject wise case laws, latest legal updates, Practical tips for PIOs and FAAs - Needs of all stakeholders covered
Share on facebook
Tweet
Email
Gmail
Google
Rediff
56% of complaints sent back to department for action by ACB
2 May, 2013
Reply to an application filed under the Right to Information (RTI) Act has revealed that the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) of Maharashtra recorded 3,522 complaints of corruption last year. Out of these, the ACB forwarded 1,973 (56%) to the concerned departments for inquiry. The ACB did not conduct any investigation of its own because of manpower shortage and because many complaints were vague or not credible. It is yet to receive a response from a department on any of these complaints.
In 1972, the state government had issued a circular which restrained the ACB from probing government employees without first referring the complaint for a departmental inquiry to the head of the concerned department. The circular was in existence till the early part of this century when the Bombay high court quashed it. However, the practise continues as exemplified from the figures for Mumbai, where the ACB redirected nearly 77% of the 1,618 complaints received by it. The practice of the Anti-Corruption Bureau's (ACB) to refer the cases to the very departments against whose officials the complaints were made has been criticised by many social activists. The ability of the department to conduct an enquiry is limited as they neither have powers to conduct raids or searches nor can question a private individual.
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.