A one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters

..

one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters

How to file a RTI application

CIC took grave exception to the initial deemed refusal caused by the then PIO as well as his failure to comply with the FAA’s order; PIO to send a proper written explanation for the above omission and in doing so, the onus of omission lies with the PIO

Appellant: Information provided by the Respondent is case specific; the general rules under which a PLI proposal can be rejected were not provided - CIC enquired and directed the Respondent to re-examine and furnish the general P.O.I.F. rules

Appellant: Though Rajubhai inherited a house, he misrepresented his eligibility to wrongfully qualify for and receive the PMAY subsidy; Records and actions taken sought - NHB: No formal complaint lodged - CIC: No intervention required in the matter

CIC: Section 138(1)(b) of the IT Act specifically states that information relating to an assessee can only be supplied subject to the satisfaction of Principal Chief Commissioner or CC or PC or Commissioner; It would prevail over Section 22 of the RTI Act

PIO provided a cyclostyled response to applicant seeking information about distance Mode at Private Universities - CIC: Conduct of PIO indicates a sheer disregard for the mandate of the RTI Act; Penalty of Rs. 5,000/- imposed for deemed refusal

Information was not provided by the Department of Hindu Religious Institutions and Waqf and FAA’s order was also not complied; PIO abstained from hearing - CIC issued a SCN to the present PIO and the then PIO for imposing penalty u/s 20 (1) of the RTI Act

Vijai Sharma and K V Chowdary appointed as CIC and CVC respectively

Is the Mysore Police Commissioner’s office coming up without plan approval?

No action taken against the illegal massage parlours or spas in Goa

Are there norms about the fee a school should charge and the facilities it offers?

There is only 1 primary health centre per 28 villages of UP

Services of all OSDs / Consultants terminated by Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Disclosure of marks secured by the appellant and others in the District Court Clerical recruitment process

Transparency is a pathway to better Elections and stronger Democracy

RTI portal – Supreme Court issues contempt notice to the States and UTs

2nd edition of "PIOs Guide on RTI" published - Based on study of over one lakh orders of CIC and judgments of Courts - Book carries subject wise case laws, latest legal updates, Practical tips for PIOs and FAAs - Needs of all stakeholders covered

Share on facebook Tweet Email Gmail Google Rediff

Print

RTI - Information Commissioners do not have requisite qualifications

26 Aug, 2012

On the basis of a reply received in response to an application filed under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, it has been claimed that the Information Commissioners (ICs) appointed in Andhra Pradesh didn’t fulfill the required criteria for the post. The appointments of M. Ratan, S. Prabhakar Reddy, C. MadhukarRaj, all of them retired bureaucrats, and P. Vijay Babu, a journalist to the post of Information Commissioners has been challenged in the Andhra Pradesh High Court. A Division Bench of the AP High Court comprising of the acting Chief Justice P.C. Ghose and Justice Vilas Afzulpurkar has held that the information provided was not sufficient to issue writ of quo warranto and has adjourned the case by a week.

There have been many complaints against the appointment of the information commissioners all over the country.

Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.