A one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
..


Information regarding awarding of qualification marks for promotion was sought by appellant claiming that he has not promoted for 30 years - PIO: collection & collation of information would result in avoidable diversion of man power - CIC: order upheld     Right to Information Act 2005    CIC: Details like income tax returns, moveable and immovable property qualifies to be “personal information” as defined in Section 8(1)(j); not to be disclosed unless the disclosure of the information was justified in larger public interest     Right to Information Act 2005    CIC: Puducherry Police Welfare Society is a ‘public authority’ as it is an ‘authority or institution of ‘self government’ constituted or established by notification or order issued by the appropriate Govt.; it is also controlled by the appropriate Govt.     Right to Information Act 2005    Information regarding her interview taken by Gateway Terminal of India Company was sought by a Project affected person - PIO: GTIPL is a private organization that it is working with the respondent authority on PPP basis - CIC: Denial of information upheld     Right to Information Act 2005    Information regarding a particular Letter of Credit was denied by MMTC claiming it as commercial information of third party held by them in fiduciary capacity - CIC: the plea of public interest at the appeal stage was an unsubstantiated afterthought     Right to Information Act 2005    Appellant asked for copy of complaint filed against him by his wife to police & the inquiry report - PIO denied it u/s 8(1)(g) claiming that disclosure may endanger the life or physical safety of the appellant’s wife - CIC: provide the information     Right to Information Act 2005    Maharashtra Governor directs to withdraw the notification exempting ACB     Right to Information Act 2005    The Punjab and Haryana high court issues notices to the Haryana government & former CM     Right to Information Act 2005    Kerala High Court directs the PIO to pay a litigation cost to the RTI applicant     Right to Information Act 2005    Just 2.5 % of RTI applicants are below poverty line     Right to Information Act 2005    Over 400 Lok Sabha members have not declared their assets and liabilities to the secretariat     Right to Information Act 2005    Government calls for application for the post of Chief Information Commissioner at CIC     Right to Information Act 2005    Criteria for marking official records 'Top Secret', 'Secret' and 'Confidential' made public     Right to Information Act 2005    PIO’s work does not end with mere transfer of RTI application     Right to Information Act 2005    Shouldn’t Madras High Court also review its RTI Fee Rules?     Right to Information Act 2005   


Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.