A one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
..
A one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters


Due to the unpreparedness exhibited at hearing, the CIC was compelled to postpone the hearing - CIC: Chief Commissioner of Customs, Delhi Zone is instructed to revisit the provisions of the RTI Act in his jurisdiction & issue directives to the concerned     Right to Information Act 2005    The proceedings under the RTI Act cannot be converted into proceedings for adjudication of disputes as to the correctness of the information furnished - CIC: This matter pertains to redressal of grievance that needs to be resolved at an appropriate forum     Right to Information Act 2005    Information pertaining to the selection of applicants for empanelment to take up mineral investigation works allotted by NMET - CIC: The reply by the PIO was an error of judgment with no malafide intention; PIO counselled to be careful in future     Right to Information Act 2005    Detail of municipal laws enacted on the basis of international treaties & conventions ratified by GoI were sought - PIO: Such details are not held exclusively by any public authority and the statutory enactments are in public domain - CIC: Order upheld     Right to Information Act 2005    CIC: The RTI application was transferred after 16 days delay excluding the five days mandate as specified under the Act - CIC: The information was provided by PIO after 67 days from the date of receiving the RTI application; Penalty of Rs. 16,750 imposed     Right to Information Act 2005    CIC: Even if PIO’s claim of APS, Ramgarh not being a public authority is conceded with, fact remains that the RTI Application is being responded by a public authority and not by APS, Ramgarh; Explaination for non-appearance during the hearing called     Right to Information Act 2005    Vijai Sharma and K V Chowdary appointed as CIC and CVC respectively     Right to Information Act 2005    Is the Mysore Police Commissioner’s office coming up without plan approval?     Right to Information Act 2005    No action taken against the illegal massage parlours or spas in Goa     Right to Information Act 2005    Are there norms about the fee a school should charge and the facilities it offers?     Right to Information Act 2005    There is only 1 primary health centre per 28 villages of UP     Right to Information Act 2005    Services of all OSDs / Consultants terminated by Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai     Right to Information Act 2005    Internet Banking OTP should be part of Mandatory SMS and should not be chargeable     Right to Information Act 2005    A critique of the Supreme Court judgment regarding the fee to be charged under the RTI Act     Right to Information Act 2005    Analysis of the Supreme Court Judgment regarding disclosure of Civil Service results by UPSC     Right to Information Act 2005   

Latest Bytes

Kerala: Missing files not a valid excuse for denial of information under RTI Act
April 28, 2015
Breach is punishable with imprisonment up to 5 years or fine, or both   more>>
Right to Information activist Chetan Sharma receives gunshot injury
April 27, 2015
His dog killed while Sharma recuperating in the hospital   more>>
Madras High Court issues notice to the Centre regarding vacancy in CIC
April 26, 2015
A PIL was filed seeking filling up the vacant post of the Chief Information Commissioner   more>>
State Information Commissioner complains to Governor against denigration and degradation
April 24, 2015
Special Chief Secretary directed the AP Collectors to ignore the threats from SIC   more>>
Delhi HC - Medical expenses of SC judges not to be disclosed under RTI Act
April 23, 2015
No public interest involved in disclosure of the medical facilities availed by the individual judges   more>>
Analysis of the financial or commercial declaration made by Members of Rajya Sabha
April 22, 2015
Lok Sabha members should make a declaration to avoid a conflict of interest   more>>