It’s unfortunate to post that I was transferred in 2012 on complaint
Ref: 32 CBI officers found guilty of corruption in last three years
Comment: Sir, the news item shows that Ganesh Verma, SP was transferred from Imphal in 2012. I submit that I was the SP in Imphal. I joined there in 2009 and was transferred in 2011 after completing 2nd tenure of two years posting in North East. It was a normal transfer and I was posted on promotion to ACB, Delhi. I retired in 2012.
I may also submit that I remained posted in North East from 2003 to 2007 in my first tenure and it was due to my experience in North East that I was again sent to Imphal in 2009 to set up CBI office. I set up CBI offices in entire North East. It’s unfortunate that it has been posted I was transferred in 2012 on complaint. In 2012, I was posted in ACB, Delhi. It can be verified from the records of the CBI. If you verify the truth you would find that it was other way round and my transfer was routine. Kindly do check it and rectify the mistake if any. Also check with the CBI also. Please let me… let me lead a peaceful retired life as Senior citizen. I am available at No. 9968292208. May contact me if required.
Name: Ganesh Verma
Email id: email@example.com
Kindly go through the news published on the website. We could not find any mention of any Ganesh Verma. Is there still any grievance?
32 CBI officers found guilty of corruption in last three years
10 Aug, 2013
An application was filed with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) under the Right to Information (RTI) Act seeking to get the details about the officials in the department found guilty of corruption or human rights violation and the action taken against them.
The reply to the query shows that action was taken against 32 officials in the last three years for their involvement in different cases of corruption. The list provided in the reply shows that six persons were found guilty of corruption in 2010, 17 in 2011 and 9 in 2012. In 2013, as yet two officers have been found guilty on corruption charges. The reply shows that departmental action against those found guilty included warning them, punishment and also transfer to different departments. However, it also shows that a few guilty officers were penalised monetarily.
The vigilance cell of CBI also provided some information about details of those complaints which resulted in departmental action against CBI personnel. However, other cells of CBI didn't provide any information on personnel with charges of corruption or human rights violation.