A one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
..


Information on FDI related to M/s. Brahma City Pvt. Ltd. & M/s. Brahma Centre Dev. Pvt. Ltd was denied u/s 8(1)(d) & (e) - Appellant claimed that these Companies had violated FEMA regulations- CIC: Denial upheld; FAA cautioned to be careful in future     Right to Information Act 2005    The list of legal representative who represented RBI before the CIC was sought - Respondent: No record maintained as to which officer would attend the hearing in matter before CIC & even the changes were made at last moment - CIC: Decision upheld     Right to Information Act 2005    Copies of show cause notices issued to various Telecom Companies & action thereon was denied u/s 8(1)(d) - CIC: Appellant has not appeared before the CIC to demonstrate that the disclosure of the information is in larger public interest; appeal disposed     Right to Information Act 2005    Information regarding harassment by her daughter in law etc was sought - CIC: National Commission for Women had given two contradictory replies to the appellant; PIO directed to provide clear position regarding the complaint registered with NCW     Right to Information Act 2005    Claiming himself to be a social worker, the appellant sought information like the complaints received against an officer since his joining the service, educational qualifications, caste, children’s education details, bank accounts etc - CIC: Appeal closed     Right to Information Act 2005    CIC: As per Rule 3 of the RTI Rules, 2012 an application under the RTI Act shall not contain more than 500 words whereas the applicant has sent a documents consisting 110 pages; Applicant is advised to be precise in seeking information in future     Right to Information Act 2005    Civil Services Board yet to start their effective functioning in the states     Right to Information Act 2005    Should there be a standard format for reply to the RTI Applications?     Right to Information Act 2005    How open is India in terms of openness of government?     Right to Information Act 2005    In 10 years, the CIC has imposed a penalty on 1,071 officers under the RTI Act     Right to Information Act 2005    Delhi High Court judgment regarding Attorney General of India stayed     Right to Information Act 2005    2,225 Million litres of untreated water is discharged daily in Delhi     Right to Information Act 2005    Disclosure of the Manual of the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption     Right to Information Act 2005    UP State Information Commission displays a set of draft RTI Rules     Right to Information Act 2005    An analysis of the Delhi HC judgment regarding office of the Attorney General of India     Right to Information Act 2005   


Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.