A one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
..
HOME
INTRODUCTION
ABOUT US
CONTACT US
HOW TO FILE RTI APPLICATION
A one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
Menu
Home
Introduction
About Us
Contact Us
DOPT circulars
Link to other Organisations
FAQ - For an Applicant
FAQ - For a PIO
Join us
Web-Site Launch Photographs
Web-Site Launch Photographs
RTI Act, 2005
Hindi
English
Other language
Rules
Central rules
State rules
Guide book
DOPT circulars
Important judgments
Supreme court
High court
Tracking the appeal at CIC
Link to Information Commission
Link to other Organisations
For an Applicant
FAQ
For a PIO
FAQ
Feedback
Books on RTI
Join us
Copy of NOC issued to an Airman (IAF) was denied claiming that it is 'Personal Information' the disclosure of which would cause unwarranted invasion to the privacy of the individual - CIC: Denial u/s 8(1)(j) upheld; No larger public interest disclosed
PIO informed the Appellant that the information sought is not available in their office and transferred the application to Bangalore Development Authority u/s 6(3) - Appellant did not approach the transferee Public Authority - CIC: No intervention needed
Transfer of pension to wrong account - Neither the RTI application nor the first appeal was responded by the respondent, on account of non-receipt - Respondent furnished a reply which the appellant claimed to have not received - CIC: Provide revised reply
Information regarding home loan in which appellant’s mother, i.e., late Smt. V Jain was a guarantor - CIC: Information was related to third party property loan (Mr. Pradeep Jain and Smt. V Jain), and both are alive; No public activity or interest involved
Total number of accounts opened by PNB under different welfare schemes - Delay of almost two years - CIC: PIO is cautioned and advised to strengthen its RTI portal to enable effective and timely disposal of RTI applications and first appeals in future
CIC: The issue raised by the Appellant remains unanswered due to non-availability of any material information in the records; Advisory u/s 25(5) issued to the Office of Insurance Ombudsman to look into such cases in larger public interest
Vijai Sharma and K V Chowdary appointed as CIC and CVC respectively
Is the Mysore Police Commissioner’s office coming up without plan approval?
No action taken against the illegal massage parlours or spas in Goa
Are there norms about the fee a school should charge and the facilities it offers?
There is only 1 primary health centre per 28 villages of UP
Services of all OSDs / Consultants terminated by Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Are the state-funded ‘public trust institutions’ obligated to provide ‘information’ under the RTI Act?
Takeaways from the Supreme Court verdict on the Electoral Bond Scheme
We will know, we will live - RTI
2nd edition of "PIOs Guide on RTI" published - Based on study of over one lakh orders of CIC and judgments of Courts - Book carries subject wise case laws, latest legal updates, Practical tips for PIOs and FAAs - Needs of all stakeholders covered
Share on facebook
Tweet
Email
Gmail
Google
Rediff
Delhi HC seeks copies of audited accounts of Rajiv Gandhi Foundation
6 Jul, 2012
Justice Rajiv Shakdher of the Delhi High Court has directed the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation (RGF) to place on record its annual audited accounts right from its inception till 2010-2011 to decide whether the organization should be included within the ambit of the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The next date of hearing the matter has been fixed for November 21. The HC directed "File the annual audited accounts right from its inception till the year 2010-2011 along with a tabular statement indicating year-wise overall income of the Foundation and the component thereof received from the central as well as state governments or the instrumentalities thereof,",
The Delhi High Court was hearing the plea of a Delhi-based lawyer, Mr. Shanmuga Patro, who challenged the order of the Central Information Commission (CIC) dismissing his appeal while holding that the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation is not a public authority. Earlier Mr. Patro had filed an application under the RTI Act seeking a copy of the constitution of the RGF, a copy of the updated bye-laws and rules and regulation of the Foundation and a copy of the documents showing its organizational structure. He claimed that the RGF was in receipt of funds from the government, and it is engaged in large-scale public activities and by virtue of such activities it assumes the character of a public authority. The RGF had denied the information on the ground that it was not a public authority and had received only 4% funding from the government, which is not substantial. Therefore, it is not a public authority and does not fall under the purview of Section
2(h)
“public authority” means any authority or body or institution of self-government established or constituted (a) by or under the Constitution; (b) by any other law made by Parliament; (c) by any other law made by State Legislature; (d) by notification issued or order made by the appropriate Government, and includes any- (i) body owned, controlled or substantially financed; (ii) non-Government organization substantially financed, directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate Government;
of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.