A one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
..


Appellant claimed that as he was admitted together along with two patients, he has the right to know about their medico legal reports also - CIC: the third party information is kept in fiduciary capacity & no public interest is involved in disclosure     Right to Information Act 2005    The appellant came to know through RTI that the school is not recognized & wanted the Directorate of Education to initiate action against the school under Sections 18/19 of the RTE Act, 2009 - CIC recommended the public authority to act take action     Right to Information Act 2005    CIC: Information cannot be denied on the ground that its supply would disproportionately divert the resources of the public authority; provide information relating to reference to the Attorney General GE Vahanvati to take part in 2G spectrum case     Right to Information Act 2005    Information regarding death claim of a policy - Respondent: Claim repudiation register & register of death claim bears the entries claim cases in respect of others which cannot be shared - CIC: provide copies after severing the third party information     Right to Information Act 2005    CIC: Unless proved that record was destroyed as per the prescribed rules of retention policy, it is deemed to be held by public authority; Claim of file missing has no legality; It amounts to breach of Public Records Act, 1993 & is punishable     Right to Information Act 2005    Information regarding a Consumer Forum case & Motor Own Damage case was sought - CIC: information sought is third party information held in fiduciary capacity by United India Insurance; investigation is also in progress; denial upheld     Right to Information Act 2005    Should the translation of the records be provided under RTI?     Right to Information Act 2005    Sewa Hami Adhiniyam to be introduced in Maharashtra     Right to Information Act 2005    17 tubectomies performed for every vasectomy done in Mumbai     Right to Information Act 2005    UP SIC takes a strict view for delay in replying to the RTI applications     Right to Information Act 2005    Proper record keeping in soft form required for robust computerised banking operation     Right to Information Act 2005    No representative of political party appears before the CIC in response to notice     Right to Information Act 2005    Criteria for marking official records 'Top Secret', 'Secret' and 'Confidential' made public     Right to Information Act 2005    PIO’s work does not end with mere transfer of RTI application     Right to Information Act 2005    Shouldn’t Madras High Court also review its RTI Fee Rules?     Right to Information Act 2005   


Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.