A one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters
..
A one stop destination for all Right to Information (RTI) matters


Appellant: When an Enquiry Officer had accepted in his report that he was clear and had no allegations, how he was found guilty and punished? CIC: For redressal of his grievance, the Appellant is advised to approach an appropriate forum     Right to Information Act 2005    Appellant sought information regarding the action taken on his complaint – CIC: Complete & correct information has not been provided - CIC took a serious note of this lapse & counselled the PIO to be more careful in future so that such lapses do not recur     Right to Information Act 2005    Copy of the receipt given to the department of C. Excise from whose possession his case file was taken, the file duly authenticated by the agency who took its possession, the action taken on the said file. etc was sought - CIC: No intervention is required     Right to Information Act 2005    Complainant: He does not wish to press the matter as he only wanted to make the bench aware of the inaction of JS (Law), the then PIO - JS (Law): The state of pendency of RTI Applications was very alarming - CIC warned the PIO & closed the case     Right to Information Act 2005    Action taken on appellant’s complaint - CIC instructed to furnish a copy of the CVC Circular followed by the respondent in all such matters; The broad outcome of the investigation should be intimated to him as and the inquiry gets completed     Right to Information Act 2005    Information regarding the action taken on the application filed by the applicant - CIC: The information held on record had been shared with the Appellant; For redressal of his grievance, the Appellant is advised to approach an appropriate forum     Right to Information Act 2005    Vijai Sharma and K V Chowdary appointed as CIC and CVC respectively     Right to Information Act 2005    Is the Mysore Police Commissioner’s office coming up without plan approval?     Right to Information Act 2005    No action taken against the illegal massage parlours or spas in Goa     Right to Information Act 2005    Are there norms about the fee a school should charge and the facilities it offers?     Right to Information Act 2005    There is only 1 primary health centre per 28 villages of UP     Right to Information Act 2005    Services of all OSDs / Consultants terminated by Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai     Right to Information Act 2005    Does the Government have any mechanism to monitor compliance of its own directive?     Right to Information Act 2005    Should “corruption” be factored into studies on the ‘ease of doing business’?     Right to Information Act 2005    Indian Bank Association is a public authority under the RTI Act, 2005     Right to Information Act 2005   

Case Laws

November 24, 2017
Detailed list of sundry creditors to each Private/Government Owned Hospital by the Ministry of Health & family welfare etc. was sought - CIC: CGHS shall make proactive disclosure regarding its institutional creditors & amounts due towards each of them...more>>
November 22, 2017
CIC: The then PIO is issued an advisory that full & final reply to an RTI application should be provided within the stipulated time period under the RTI Act; Reply to each of the points raised in the concerned RTI application should be comprehensive...more>>



November 20, 2017
PIO: The information being more than 20 years old was not traceable - PIO: The JCIT, Allahabad had prepared an inquiry report; nothing adverse was noticed after inquiry & no responsibility was fixed - CIC: Provide a copy of the inquiry report to Appellant...more>>
November 18, 2017
CIC: The certified copy of a circular issued in 2008 could not be provided after more than one and half years - CIC: The mere administrative transfer of RTI application to the corporate office of the IRCTC was not the correct procedure; PIO warned...more>>



November 16, 2017
CIC cautioned the appellant to desist from abuse of RTI Act and stop harassing the public authority & the Commission - CIC: The abusive & repetitive RTI applications could be rejected in the public interest & to secure the interests of genuine RTI seekers...more>>
November 13, 2017
Applicant: Is Provident Fund at IIFM, Bhopal was governed by PF Act, 1925? - CIC: Appellant is not allowed to deviate from the subject matter of the RTI application at appellate stage; For additional information, a fresh RTI application may be filed...more>>



Articles

Does the Government have any mechanism to monitor compliance of its own directive?
February 12, 2018
CIC had recommended to upload work done by all Ministries on their respective websites   more>>
Should “corruption” be factored into studies on the ‘ease of doing business’?
December 10, 2017
Action taken by the anti-graft agencies to prosecute the corrupt would give a better indication   more>>
Indian Bank Association is a public authority under the RTI Act, 2005
December 2, 2017
Majority of Managing Committee members of IBA are MDs of PSBs   more>>

Comments

Information regarding my complaint in case of fake degree of a Government employee
July 2, 2017
I also preferred first appeal in this case but no complete information provided to me   more>>
The RTI applicants demand such information which are not possible to be provided
June 28, 2017
The Right to Information Act, 2005 is losing its sanctity day by day due to its misuse   more>>
Who will inquire into the unaudited account of the cooperative housing society?
June 13, 2017
This decision will give rise to enormous misappropriation of the cooperative society’s fund   more>>